At all times, the most urgent issue of humanity was considered to be its awareness of its place in the universe. And in these considerations, the Creator was always considered the key point. The answer to this question directly depends on its presence or absence.
The presence or absence of creativity in the universe has always been based on three whales of human collective knowledge: paradoxes, conscience and love. It is these three elements that the conscious function has always correlated directly with God. That is, a person could never explain the listed aspects with anything other than a supernatural beginning. For example, the globality of the Universe, its ability to evolve, the quality of matter to arise as if from nothing and turn into the most unthinkable forms has always been attributed by the human mind to irrationality and the infinite Reason of the crown of creation - God.
Such a decision could take place under one single condition, when a person could give the palm of primacy as a carrier of a conscious function to some entity more developed in terms of mental creativity - for example, to God. But here a lot of questions arise that can never come into harmony with the newly emerging facts in the process of the academic or scientific development of mankind. After all, it is no coincidence that a reasonable person categorically separates the concepts of hypothetically “to believe” and reliably “to know”.
In short, the academic concept of "paradox", the "unconscious", pseudoscientific from psychology, and the religious "god" have the same source of knowledge of the external world. And therefore, the acceptance of the understanding that over time, science will further and further penetrate into the "shadow zone", illuminating in the literal sense ignorance and that part of knowledge that is now in an imbalance with some laws of the universe, called by man an irrational (illogical) beginning, seems to be an exceptionally correct approach to the problem of studying the external world.
In addition, it is important to understand that the Universe cannot develop irrationally if its creative principle in the form of a conscious function, the bearer of which is a person, is endowed with the only instrument of cognition of its legislative initiative - logic. That is, it is the logical or rational aspect of cognition that leads to an understanding of the very process of building the Universe, which is also based on the logical principle.
So, the "paradox" in its hypostasis of the destruction of the logical (human) principle can be considered a defeated mind. It remains to understand the concepts of "conscience" and "love", to which the adherents of the principle of the divine principle of the Universe always appeal. And here it is the fact of acceptance of conscience and love for mental organization that begins to confuse the whole picture at the very beginning of reasoning. After accepting a person not only as a bearer of physiology and reason, but also as a divine essence of a lower hierarchy than the Creator himself, the concept of a soul was introduced, which, similar to a “paradox”, does not lend itself to understandable logical analysis.
With such a distribution of forces, a certain crown to God is created, which simply does not lend itself to comprehension, but is a kind of "black box", the decoding of which is impossible. Moreover, it is precisely "love" and "conscience" in this pseudo-reasonable construction of reasoning that are traditionally accepted as evidence of the "mental organization" of a person. After all, no one can reliably understand the principles of these concepts, because it is in them that a lot of contradictions to ordinary logic are concentrated. For example, an outright villain may suffer from bouts of conscience, and an outright cynic may be subject to powerful outbursts of love. Such a ratio of human characters and manifestations of conscience and love, it would seem, does not correspond to logic and is easier to correlate with a “paradox” or God!
But everything changes if we accept the absence of a soul, and the introduced concepts of "conscience" and "love" are accepted as products of a conscious function. That is, it is the rational principle that forms the "conscience", which plays the most primitive role in the consciousness of an individual - his safety in society. After all, only this tool can save an individual from the contradiction of living together in a team.
With love, the situation is even easier if, again, follow the above logic. The attraction of love (not a physiological passion at the level of the chemistry of the body!) Arises when the object of romantic research coincides with its image that every person has as a kind of standard. This image is a pure product of a conscious function, and, in addition, it is a conscious function that makes that natural analysis of the object of research with a reference model.
Summing up all of the above, one simple thing should be understood - only the conscious function of a person can be regarded as the crown of the creation of the Universe. Therefore, the religious concept of God, who lives in the heart of every believer, is correlated in such an analysis by atheists with a conscious function based on the cerebral cortex. By the way, the collective knowledge of all mankind in this sense can be regarded as the Creator's religious epithets: Omnipresent, Infinite and All-Powerful.